<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeff Goldblatt Blogs about Iowa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weather.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/jeff-goldblatt-blogs-about-iowa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weather.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/jeff-goldblatt-blogs-about-iowa/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Margie Gacki</title>
		<link>http://weather.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/jeff-goldblatt-blogs-about-iowa/#comment-9900</link>
		<dc:creator>Margie Gacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weathermachine.wordpress.com/?p=1415#comment-9900</guid>
		<description>Hey Don, it doesn't take too much to confuse me either!  That article was interesting but it really didn't give a side by side comparison of the scales, which would have made it easier to see the difference.  I'm glad you sent Janice a couple pictures.  I'll be looking forward to seeing them.  It will be fun to have another person join our party!  I'll have to find a great spot for all of us to visit!

Margie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Don, it doesn&#8217;t take too much to confuse me either!  That article was interesting but it really didn&#8217;t give a side by side comparison of the scales, which would have made it easier to see the difference.  I&#8217;m glad you sent Janice a couple pictures.  I&#8217;ll be looking forward to seeing them.  It will be fun to have another person join our party!  I&#8217;ll have to find a great spot for all of us to visit!</p>
<p>Margie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don in Richmond</title>
		<link>http://weather.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/jeff-goldblatt-blogs-about-iowa/#comment-9898</link>
		<dc:creator>Don in Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weathermachine.wordpress.com/?p=1415#comment-9898</guid>
		<description>I read too much.  Doesn't take a lot to confuse me.  By the way Margie sent two pics of me to Janice, have a blast.  Actually the only 2 of me I have as an adult.  I do have many from when I was a kid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read too much.  Doesn&#8217;t take a lot to confuse me.  By the way Margie sent two pics of me to Janice, have a blast.  Actually the only 2 of me I have as an adult.  I do have many from when I was a kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margie Gacki</title>
		<link>http://weather.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/jeff-goldblatt-blogs-about-iowa/#comment-9896</link>
		<dc:creator>Margie Gacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weathermachine.wordpress.com/?p=1415#comment-9896</guid>
		<description>Hey Don,

I think that's the original Fujita scale you listed.  That's the one they talked about on the web site and how it needed to be updated.  That article on the NOAA site really didn't make it clear between that one and the Enhanced Fujita scale that is in Janice's post above.  It's just one more thing to confuse us poor folks!  Just when you get used to one, they have to go and change it!

Margie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Don,</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s the original Fujita scale you listed.  That&#8217;s the one they talked about on the web site and how it needed to be updated.  That article on the NOAA site really didn&#8217;t make it clear between that one and the Enhanced Fujita scale that is in Janice&#8217;s post above.  It&#8217;s just one more thing to confuse us poor folks!  Just when you get used to one, they have to go and change it!</p>
<p>Margie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wenchie</title>
		<link>http://weather.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/jeff-goldblatt-blogs-about-iowa/#comment-9893</link>
		<dc:creator>Wenchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weathermachine.wordpress.com/?p=1415#comment-9893</guid>
		<description>I just read Jeff's report....He uses the right word..."Mind boggling"

Fortunately human beings really are survivors....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read Jeff&#8217;s report&#8230;.He uses the right word&#8230;&#8221;Mind boggling&#8221;</p>
<p>Fortunately human beings really are survivors&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don in Richmond</title>
		<link>http://weather.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/jeff-goldblatt-blogs-about-iowa/#comment-9892</link>
		<dc:creator>Don in Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weathermachine.wordpress.com/?p=1415#comment-9892</guid>
		<description>What am I missing?  At the Noaa website they say

F0 40-73

F1 73-113

F2 113-158

F3 158-207

F4 207-261

F5 261-315</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What am I missing?  At the Noaa website they say</p>
<p>F0 40-73</p>
<p>F1 73-113</p>
<p>F2 113-158</p>
<p>F3 158-207</p>
<p>F4 207-261</p>
<p>F5 261-315</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
